alden Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I don't know if king and lawler have great chem.......Jr is one of the best announcers around.......he did great work in wcw and with people other then the king. The king did great with styles and i think is doing ok with cole. I don't think they have great chem...they are just talented workers. I don't know if ross and lawler is better then lawler and styles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justtxyank Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Let's also remember that their prime was a decade ago as announcers. 1998-2001ish, the Attitude era. They are both much older now. They are also much more controlled now than they ever were, the product is different that they are commentating on... Would Jerry Lawler have been any different in 1999 if it had been Tony Schiavone next to him in the booth? I don't think so really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl_Kitsch Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 And Ross and Heyman was better than any other team of that era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nedew Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 And Ross and Heyman was better than any other team of that era. ____ and Heyman is generally a solid combo, as is Ross and _____. They just put the two best announcers/colour guys together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Jim Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I'd be tempted to put negative chemistry between Cole and King. Cole was fine with Tazz, and JBL. King has been fine with other play-by-play guys. Together, I find them both near unbearable. Maybe that's because they've always been supported by better partners, maybe this product is just harder to work with than even a few years ago, I'm sure other arguments could be put forward for why... but the two really turn me off Raw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Shape Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 John Cena and Jack Swagger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl_Kitsch Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 I'd be tempted to put negative chemistry between Cole and King. Cole was fine with Tazz, and JBL. King has been fine with other play-by-play guys. Together, I find them both near unbearable. Maybe that's because they've always been supported by better partners, maybe this product is just harder to work with than even a few years ago, I'm sure other arguments could be put forward for why... but the two really turn me off Raw. Seconded. I think negative chemistry is easier to eye than positive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxFutureLegend112xX Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Apologies if this has been asked before but i haven't been following this thread all that closely. But im just wondering will you be able to assign workers as having just neutral chemistry in the editor? thnx for any help . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterded Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Apologies if this has been asked before but i haven't been following this thread all that closely. But im just wondering will you be able to assign workers as having just neutral chemistry in the editor? thnx for any help . yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeemuFoundation Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Apologies if this has been asked before but i haven't been following this thread all that closely. But im just wondering will you be able to assign workers as having just neutral chemistry in the editor? thnx for any help . Yes indeed. And that's by far the best thing about the new feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justtxyank Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Seconded. I think negative chemistry is easier to eye than positive. Yep. It is blatantly obvious because you see workers who should have been able to produce a solid match throw up a stinker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.