Jump to content

TEW2020 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Teh_Showtime" data-cite="Teh_Showtime" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>This is already in 2016. The default data has multiple times where it happens, most notably to USPW.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I think a big difference would be that it happens organically, not by the user adding a narrative. UPSW/Reverie (however you spell it) only expands due to a narrative if I am not mistaken.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

<p>There has been a lot of work gone into the new game, very impressed by the new features and it is getting better. I sure hope we get to see an "auto booker" option for the undercard and/or undercard events. Where you can pre-pick who you want to push/bury.</p><p> </p><p>

That is by far my money request because when you run the Global promotions with 100-150 events per year, booking all the matches is tedious. The autobooker is great, but you do not get the option to pick the workers you want pushed/buried, so you still need to edit all the matches. </p><p> </p><p>

Auto-contracts is the second feature i want for sure. When you have a massive roster, contracting workers becomes a chore. I would love to have the option for free agents as well (in other words, auto offer the max contract to get him signed).</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Teh_Showtime" data-cite="Teh_Showtime" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>This is already in 2016. The default data has multiple times where it happens, most notably to USPW.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Nope, it is not in TEW 16 and it does not happen organically in any way. Only with narratives, If I'm not mistaken. It does happen however on WMMA5 and I hope to see it expanded upon and improved. It would be pretty awesome for us to influence the broadcaster we signed with, like irl, giving more importance to ratings and making it possible to grow the broadcaster and the ratings (with time) so the day may come where can afford to reject the bigger broadcasters, as we already led the one we signed with to that size.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Few things I would love to see in 2020. </p><p> </p><p>

. I second Capelli King on auto-booker enhancements. I like to use B shows to get lower card guys reps, it would be nice to have a setting that can be toggled to always win matches. The auto-booker would be smart enough not to book two guys with this flag set against each other , kind of like how the scripting/call in the ring auto adds the correct booking note. </p><p> </p><p>

. Tag Teams - Would love to see a couple of things for tag teams. </p><p> </p><p>

The first would be that during a brand split draft, give the option to keep tag teams that are units together. </p><p> </p><p>

Next would be the auto-booker when it applies to Tag Teams, any team that is classified as a unit should ALWAYS be booked together and in tag matches. For example, the Road Warriors shouldn't both appear on a card in singles matches or worse yet Hawk vs Ric Flair in a singles match while Animal joins Lex Luger vs two other random people in a tag match. While it is easily fixed by editing the card, sometimes I just want my B shows to be booked to get guys reps. This makes it frustrating when I am trying to build up a tag team only to have the auto booker never book them together. </p><p> </p><p>

Finally, on the subject of tag teams, it would be nice to have some workers who are classified as tag team specialists, meaning that they are more likely to have good tag team chemistry with anyone. Thinking guys like Cesaro, James Storm, Ricky Morton, Arn Anderson, Billy Gunn, Bobby Eaton. None of them necessarily bad as singles but so much better in tags.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="TeemuFoundation" data-cite="TeemuFoundation" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>We can set opening dates for Broadcasters, I'm sure. So, in a historic mod, no Internet Broacasters would exist yet.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Do companies open their own broadcasters randomly though when they grow? I actually don't know so making sure that the "AWA Network" isn't an Internet Subscription network would be necessary. Thinking about it though, I don't know if I've ever seen a CPU controlled company ever create their own broadcaster.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Valdarix" data-cite="Valdarix" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Few things I would love to see in 2020. <p> </p><p> . I second Capelli King on auto-booker enhancements. I like to use B shows to get lower card guys reps, it would be nice to have a setting that can be toggled to always win matches. The auto-booker would be smart enough not to book two guys with this flag set against each other , kind of like how the scripting/call in the ring auto adds the correct booking note. </p><p> </p><p> . Tag Teams - Would love to see a couple of things for tag teams. </p><p> </p><p> The first would be that during a brand split draft, give the option to keep tag teams that are units together. </p><p> </p><p> Next would be the auto-booker when it applies to Tag Teams, any team that is classified as a unit should ALWAYS be booked together and in tag matches. For example, the Road Warriors shouldn't both appear on a card in singles matches or worse yet Hawk vs Ric Flair in a singles match while Animal joins Lex Luger vs two other random people in a tag match. While it is easily fixed by editing the card, sometimes I just want my B shows to be booked to get guys reps. This makes it frustrating when I am trying to build up a tag team only to have the auto booker never book them together. </p><p> </p><p> Finally, on the subject of tag teams, it would be nice to have some workers who are classified as tag team specialists, meaning that they are more likely to have good tag team chemistry with anyone. Thinking guys like Cesaro, James Storm, Ricky Morton, Arn Anderson, Billy Gunn, Bobby Eaton. None of them necessarily bad as singles but so much better in tags.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I'd throw those up on the suggestions board if you want to make sure they get seen.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone who requested there to be some more differences for broadcasters, I'm very excited about this week of announcements. Today's announcement was very interesting. I actually made a suggestion that was very similar to what is in the game about having the different classifications of broadcasters (though mine was not terrestrial, cable, and internet). Anything that adds different layers and strategies to playing the game makes me very interested. to I'm curious to see how it will further develop an what other broadcasting changes we're in for.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Historian" data-cite="Historian" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I'd throw those up on the suggestions board if you want to make sure they get seen.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Thanks, I'll toss them up over there.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="javier_83" data-cite="javier_83" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>ahh is just me or i see tew2016 old now, that we hear from the new improvements for the new version.. i cannot see the game the same again..</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Funny because once TEW 16 released people were saying that there isn’t much left to improve lol.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="dannewman" data-cite="dannewman" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Has Adam said anything about worker pictures changing sizes? I've got a bunch of worker pics I've been working on and would love to know if dimensions or file types are changing so I can get a jump start.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> They're staying the same.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="justtxyank" data-cite="justtxyank" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I'm still hoping for a change that has syndication as a provider option instead of us needing to create it as a workaround.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I'm still hoping for ratings to actually mean anything and for us to have non wrestling shows to compete with.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The broadcaster changes are interesting. I sometimes like to build a promotion from the ground up...drafting my own talent (well, ok, assigning guys to my roster from the editor), making titles, choosing areas, sometimes making an equivalent to the ECW Arena, etc. This seems like a way to tailor coverage to the size/popularity of the promotion in a more realistic way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's entry brings back EWR vibes in a good way. Still hoping for more though. The ratings thing i mentioned above, or stuff like companies being powerless when owned by a media group. While I do see the end of exclusivity as a possible solution for that, it doesn't seem to solve the entire issue.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would be really cool if we could hold press conferences for so many shows per year or whatever(maybe unlimited shows per year) and we could say like "invest 20k" or "30k" or whatever amount of money. Then put like "showcase this feud, this worker, this team, etc" to hype or put over new deals etc. It would also be cool to say like hold a conference to showcase this contract signing, or buying out of this company...etc. you get the idea. i think that would be completely badass. It would also be cool if you could choose to broadcast a special on tv, or your own-owned broadcaster...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Not really digging the broadcasting stuff. The financial stuff I don't really see being a big draw to players.</p><p> </p><p>

In my opinion the financial parts of the game should be streamlined so more effort can go into the core (booking).</p><p> </p><p>

I mean you see all the suggestions that go in the suggestions forum. How many are about finances that aren't about streamlining things like contract negotiations?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BuddyGarner" data-cite="BuddyGarner" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Not really digging the broadcasting stuff. The financial stuff I don't really see being a big draw to players.<p> </p><p> In my opinion the financial parts of the game should be streamlined so more effort can go into the core (booking).</p><p> </p><p> I mean you see all the suggestions that go in the suggestions forum. How many are about finances that aren't about streamlining things like contract negotiations?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I kinda agree. The entry today sounds a little too complicated.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...