Jump to content

Negative Dirt Sheet/Road Agent Report Feedback And What It Means


Recommended Posts

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="plannine" data-cite="plannine" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35149" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Alright. I guess I'll figure that one out eventually. But can anyone tell me how an occasional wrestler is supposed to be booked? Would they count as below or above midcard? I have no idea whether to book a medium, minor, or major match if it's an occasional wrestler and one other worker.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> It depends on his popularity level and how it relates to the rest of the roster.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<p>So I finally decided to try to use storylines to get workers over, had one that lasted for months, had multiple events/threads, ended around 90 heat, yet when it was over, nothing changed for either guy.</p><p> </p><p>

Edit: They both ended the storyline without "doing bad" (fairly poor, etc.) and had a positive outlook for both workers.</p><p> </p><p>

What is the point of storylines? Just to feel like you're a big-time wrestling promoter?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="mrwhippy" data-cite="mrwhippy" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35149" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Momentum changes massively. On the 1988 mod I had all my main eventers have 100 momentum after some epic storylines which all came to a conlusion after WrestleMania V.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Pretty much this. The storyline itself doesn't even have to have kick ass ratings from my experience. I've had workers gain great momentum after ending a storyline that was in the C- to B+ range because they came out looking Very Good, Great or Fantastic.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="pbbm" data-cite="pbbm" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35149" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>As someone who knows nothing about wrestling or the mechanics of this game, this was incredibly helpful. Thank you!</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I'm with pbbm. This thread is making me think I gave up on TEW 2013 a bit to quickly before.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="RKOwnage" data-cite="RKOwnage" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35149" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>What does it mean when it says they could use something to freshen their character up. A turn? A gimmick change? Does it matter?<p> </p><p> And yes I echo the above comment, this has helped me so much.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Either or both, really. I tend to play without heel/face divide though.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="plannine" data-cite="plannine" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35149" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I have a wrestler with 90 consistency getting the note "worker was penalized for inconsistency" note in pretty much every single match he's in. Is there anything else that goes into that? Am I missing something?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> maybe his age he could be in decline</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

<p>A few notes:</p><p> </p><p>

Comedy Match performance depends mostly on comedy gimmick rating. I know this because Ben Williams can do comedy bouts and has no charisma.</p><p> </p><p>

Sex Appeal and Comedy bouts can remove the penalty for being hated on by the crowd.</p><p> </p><p>

Call in ring bonus shows up as having good psychology in dirt sheet.</p><p> </p><p>

I'm not sure what the requirements are for dominate but the one guy who can do it in my fed has B- charisma. The other guys who may be around B- charisma only lose 1 point of pop for dominating jobbers rather than 2 so it could be somewhere above B- charisma to dominate but I'm not sure due to fog of war.</p><p> </p><p>

Ability to work the crowd requires psychology. Not sure how much charisma etc. is needed but know you can't get the bonus without psych. Know it can work in first two matches.</p><p> </p><p>

Not sure what the requirements are for keep strong and protect working because worker doesn't always get the bonus in dirt sheet.</p><p> </p><p>

And chemistry(overwhelmed by manager) doesn't always mean a destiny thing as I've had people who get once in a whole but on the whole mostly get helped by the manager. Or perhaps the penalty is an intermittent thing on the whole.</p><p> </p><p>

Match rating can get a bonus for announcer chemistry even if untelevised.</p><p> </p><p>

To get a bonus for managers in angles need to be rated on entertainment type skills. Off screen angles don't get dinged for substance abuse.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
The overwhelmed by manager note I've gotten with Andre Jones & Charlie Thatcher - when Jones attacked Freddie Datsun post match. Could it be because Thatcher should be the one in that angle (given his menance)? I know I've seen it between women managers overshadowing the guy, but this particular instance could be due to other attributes...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A great post, thanks for this, before I read this I used to protect the loser of every match and keep winners strong, so was taking hits on my matches every time. Very helpful <img alt=":)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/smile.png.142cfa0a1cd2925c0463c1d00f499df2.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
Can someone let me know what it means when a segmant is penalized for Title Prestige?

 

All your titles have a "prestige" rating that you can view in your title screen. Now, normally, any match is gonna get a boost from being for a title. But if your match is MUCH better than the prestige of the title the crowd is gonna go "Aww man. These guys are SOOHH awesome, why are they fighting for this two-bit belt?" and it's actually going to detract a bit from the match.

 

You can avoid most of it by making sure people aren't fighting over a title that is below them. Normally, your main eventers shouldn't be fighting for your midcard or tag titles, frex.

 

You can avoid a lot of it by boosting a title's prestige. Making sure it's defended often does this. Making sure people generally have good matches for it does this. (Even as it might lead to the note you got, and thus ding the match a little bit, it's good in the long term.) Some events, such as vacating a title, or having it sit around active but unassigned, have pretty strong negative effects, so try to avoid those...

 

 

It's sometimes inevitable though... A newly-created Main Event level title will only have a prestige of 70. So, if the match you have to crown the inaugural champion has all the makings of a classic it'll always get dinged for this. It's quite a small penalty, and it'll help the belt in the long run, but it'll be there.

 

As was said earlier in this thread: The creator of the game has said, and all experienced players know, that you CANNOT realisticaly play this game in a way that eliminates ALL penalties all the time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could someone translate this into idiot for me?

 

A raw match grade is calculated, before penalties and bonuses (momentum, gimmick, experience, etc). Their psychology has to be higher than that level.

 

For instance you can have a 100 rated match with a maximum 90 psychology because the match rating might be 90 before bonuses and penalties and thus the match comes out well above the psychology rating when factoring in momentum and the like.

 

Essentially it's a way to say the two guys in the match weren't seasoned enough to really make the match amazing. They have raw talent that can get match grades, but they don't have the psychology to get the most out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...