smw88 Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 <p>Personally I disagree, I really like the sound of the broadcast changes so far. I think they add both more flexibility and help differentiate the types which will make it more interesting in play through. It doesn't sound too complicated rather we get more variety to help replicate real life or potential scenarios. </p><p> </p><p> I have also seen a few people asking for greater micro management across the board, sometimes at really tedious levels that I feel would detract from the core game play, this I feel is not one that would.</p><p> </p><p> Appreciate others prefer different experiences hence the setting toggles which may cover more areas again in 2020 enabling players to largely play as suits their preferences</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexuscain Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 I know there are still months of updates to come but would just like to add that while all the changes so far have sounded great the one I REALLY hope to see is giving human users the option to allow the AI to book shows in their companies. As you grow the number of shows you have to run weekly can sometimes be more than you want to do by hand or in a session and I find myself just wanting an AI booker to book 1 of the weekly TV shows etc to cut down on burn out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Cobra Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="smw88" data-cite="smw88" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Personally I disagree, I really like the sound of the broadcast changes so far. I think they add both more flexibility and help differentiate the types which will make it more interesting in play through. It doesn't sound too complicated rather we get more variety to help replicate real life or potential scenarios. <p> </p><p> I have also seen a few people asking for greater micro management across the board, sometimes at really tedious levels that I feel would detract from the core game play, this I feel is not one that would.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Yeah, I don't see this as over-complicating anything, it just means when you try and get a TV deal there are a couple more sliders and stuff you can use to negotiate, but once you land it you don't have to micromanage anything until the contract comes up (or you fail to meet the deal), which is how it's always been anyway.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn michaels Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="smw88" data-cite="smw88" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Personally I disagree, I really like the sound of the broadcast changes so far. I think they add both more flexibility and help differentiate the types which will make it more interesting in play through. It doesn't sound too complicated rather we get more variety to help replicate real life or potential scenarios. <p> </p><p> I have also seen a few people asking for greater micro management across the board, sometimes at really tedious levels that I feel would detract from the core game play, this I feel is not one that would.</p><p> </p><p> Appreciate others prefer different experiences hence the setting toggles which may cover more areas again in 2020 enabling players to largely play as suits their preferences</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I completely agree. Making the game possible to be much faster to play must always be something that is prioritized, so the level of micro management some ask sometimes is not something I like. Respect for their preferences and opinions always, of course. But this entry actually seems to help immersion and is able to replicate some new scenarios that come and improve the game. I like it, but I hope there is something bigger still to come this week about the broadcaster changes. </p><p> </p><p> Once again, kudos for that EWR vibe. That possibility to divide the income with networks, or from networks to us, is awesome and takes me back twenty years ago or so.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirMichaelJordan Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BuddyGarner" data-cite="BuddyGarner" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Not really digging the broadcasting stuff. The financial stuff I don't really see being a big draw to players.<p> </p><p> In my opinion the financial parts of the game should be streamlined so more effort can go into the core (booking).</p><p> </p><p> I mean you see all the suggestions that go in the suggestions forum. How many are about finances that aren't about streamlining things like contract negotiations?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I don’t see how it’s complicated or not streamlined, all it is risk reward for making decisions. If you want to do something crazy like broadcast PPV while also giving it away for free, there is consequences in doing so.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebradska Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 Hard no, Buddy. Broadcaster adjustments have been needed desperately for awhile and there's some gems here. The ratings disruption in particular is something I've wanted to see modeled since 2013 and is a game changer. Though I do wish there was a set number of viewers per region (influenced by industry strength and population) that could be watching at any given time. It still seems like there's a potentially infinite pool of eyeballs, but this is at least a strong step in the right direction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Casey Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 Counter-programming is a fantastic addition - makes the Monday Night Wars a really viable battle now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Togg Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="James Casey" data-cite="James Casey" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Counter-programming is a fantastic addition - makes the Monday Night Wars a really viable battle now.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> </p><p> Totally one of the best features announced so far. Looks like Monday Night Football is also going to help be a thorn in the side too.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeemuFoundation Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 Fantastic. Seems like the Monday Night Wars are now finally on. The ratings and the lack of a true ratings war has always been something that has bothered me in the old TEW games. I'm very much looking forward to this. <img alt="" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/smile.png.142cfa0a1cd2925c0463c1d00f499df2.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn michaels Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 Fantastic entry today. Game changer with a lot of potential. And after being so vocal about it, i am stoked to see the return of non wrestling shows and the possibility to simulate other periods, like nowadays, where wrestling competes a lot with other non wrestling shows. 5 stars to today's announcement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeemuFoundation Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="shawn michaels" data-cite="shawn michaels" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Fantastic entry today. Game changer with a lot of potential. And after being so vocal about it, i am stoked to see the return of non wrestling shows and the possibility to simulate other periods, like nowadays, where wrestling competes a lot with other non wrestling shows. 5 stars to today's announcement.</div></blockquote><p> I believe you mean ****3/4 since the entry did not take place in the Tokyo Dome. <img alt=";)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/wink.png.686f06e511ee1fbf6bdc7d82f6831e53.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoganRodzen Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BuddyGarner" data-cite="BuddyGarner" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Not really digging the broadcasting stuff. The financial stuff I don't really see being a big draw to players.<p> </p><p> In my opinion the financial parts of the game should be streamlined so more effort can go into the core (booking).</p><p> </p><p> I mean you see all the suggestions that go in the suggestions forum. How many are about finances that aren't about streamlining things like contract negotiations?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> So you want to be the head booker and have zero control over how the company operates, that's fine, you should have that option if you want. But I know there are others, like me, who want more and more control over this game. I don't want to just be a head booker and book shows, I want to run everything from top to bottom about a wrestling company.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncrewed Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 That's one thing I really missed from the older games, non-wrestling programming. I remember seeing it in TEW 2005 and thinking, "that's really neat!" Happy to see it back and now seeing it affect our promotions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Historian Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 <p>I'm very excited about all of the broadcaster updates -- I love the broadcasting overhaul and the strategies that it can entail. It does leave me with a question though.</p><p> </p><p> When scheduling/negotiating for a TV deal, will there be an option to see what shows are already on that night and their time slots with out having to back out of the negotiation screen?</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeemuFoundation Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Previous entries have already covered how ratings / viewership will be very important in TEW2020, and one of the new features that gels with that is the ability for companies to 'block tape' TV shows.</div></blockquote><p> And there it is. The biggest feature thus far, and one that I don't see getting topped by anything. This is what I've been waiting for. And I know I'm only one of many. This should make a lot of people very happy. Nice! Now the wait for TEW 2020 has officially begun for me. <img alt=":)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/smile.png.142cfa0a1cd2925c0463c1d00f499df2.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
20LEgend Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 This week's entries have been particularly brilliant so far IMO. Lots of the big things I was hoping for have already been confirmed! Looking forward to the game even more now <img alt="" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolfanar Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 <p>Great stuff this week!</p><p> </p><p> 2 questions :</p><p> </p><p> 1) why would block taping reduce revenues in any way? It's a pure cost cutting move irl and at worst i could see it giving the shows a slight hit to quality for being a bit stale... And even that only for A shows.</p><p> </p><p> 2) can a child company create its own broadcaster?</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Ryland Posted March 8, 2019 Author Share Posted March 8, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Dolfanar" data-cite="Dolfanar" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Great stuff this week!<p> </p><p> 2 questions :</p><p> </p><p> 1) why would block taping reduce revenues in any way? It's a pure cost cutting move irl and at worst i could see it giving the shows a slight hit to quality for being a bit stale... And even that only for A shows.</p><p> </p><p> 2) can a child company create its own broadcaster?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> 1 - This was covered in the journal; if you're taping ahead then your ratings will go down, therefore you're broadcast revenue is lowered because less people are watching and revenue is linked directly to viewership.</p><p> </p><p> 2 - Yes.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeemuFoundation Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>1) why would block taping reduce revenues in any way? It's a pure cost cutting move irl and at worst i could see it giving the shows a slight hit to quality for being a bit stale... And even that only for A shows.</div></blockquote><p> Spoilers leak out. A good real life example of this is WWEäs overseas RAWs; they always cause a drop in viewership due to the fact that the results are online before the episode airs in America. It only makes sense: if there's a way to find out what happens on RAW without sitting through the entire thing, why would anyone watch it? Well, why would anyone watch RAW at all, period, is a question in and of itself, but that's a different thread.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teh_Showtime Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 It also favors live television which is able to generate much more revenue in real life and why WWE and live sports are so valuable to TV networks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeemuFoundation Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 There's been some confusion about this feature over at EWB, as well as the Discord, so just for clarification: "block tapings" means that I can now play as WWF 1995, for instance, and tape four episodes of RAW in one sitting, right? As in four episodes of a particular show, as opposed to just taping RAW, SmackDown, Superstars, and Heat on the same day. I just woke up from a nap, so my brain isn't functioning at full capacity, so I hope I phrased the question in a way that makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IWWROCKS Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="TeemuFoundation" data-cite="TeemuFoundation" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Spoilers leak out. A good real life example of this is WWEäs overseas RAWs; they always cause a drop in viewership due to the fact that the results are online before the episode airs in America. It only makes sense: if there's a way to find out what happens on RAW without sitting through the entire thing, why would anyone watch it? Well, why would anyone watch RAW at all, period, is a question in and of itself, but that's a different thread.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> That's true for the most part, although there are exceptions and examples of major angles leaking out to cause a jump in figures.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeemuFoundation Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="IWWROCKS" data-cite="IWWROCKS" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>That's true for the most part, although there are exceptions and examples of major angles leaking out to cause a jump in figures.</div></blockquote><p> That's true, and I did think about that, as well. But I think that as far as a "benefits and drawbacks" kind of gameplay features goes, this works really well.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smw88 Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 <p>I'm wondering more about the impact on the workers of booking a block.</p><p> </p><p> If you book 4 weekly TV shows for example</p><p> And a title changes on the 4th when does that flow through and what if you had a title defence on a live show after the recording but before the broadcast goes out?</p><p> </p><p> Will they get fatigue penalties for booking multiple shows a day?</p><p> </p><p> How will it impact contracts on pay or appearance limits?</p><p> </p><p> When it goes out on TV if they are working live somewhere else will that flag up comment anywhere as they are in two places at once on TV? I.e. Rick rude and the difference a day makes</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Ryland Posted March 8, 2019 Author Share Posted March 8, 2019 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="TeemuFoundation" data-cite="TeemuFoundation" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>There's been some confusion about this feature over at EWB, as well as the Discord, so just for clarification: "block tapings" means that I can now play as WWF 1995, for instance, and tape four episodes of RAW in one sitting, right? As in four episodes of a particular show, as opposed to just taping RAW, SmackDown, Superstars, and Heat on the same day. I just woke up from a nap, so my brain isn't functioning at full capacity, so I hope I phrased the question in a way that makes sense.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Yes, that is what it means.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.